Thursday, 7 August 2008

The Cost of Voting




Its interesting to see how much money and effort different parties put into elections, and compare them. The telegraph has donte this at http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/jonathan_isaby/blog/2008/08/06/counting_the_cost_of_defeat_in_the_henley_byelection

Labour's humiliating fifth place at June's by-election in Henley is just one of the factors which has contributed to the Government's current woes - and the party's 1,066 votes there didn't come cheap. Figures just released by the Returning Officer show that the Labour candidate, Readings own basher McKenzie, spent over £14,000 on his campaign, meaning that each vote (1066) cost him no less than £13.25. Their near bancupcy contributed.

Whilst the victorious Tories and second-placed Lib Dems virtually maxed out on their expenses - both spending in excess of £95,000.

The prize for efficiency goes to the Green candidate, Mark Stevenson, who came a respectable third. He spent a mere £1,055.75 to win his 1,321 votes - equivalent to only 80p per vote.

The Monster Raving Loony Party claims to have spent nothing on a campaign which elicited 242 votes from the good people of Henley. The BNP by contrast spent a fortune at £4,744 to get a paltry 1243 votes.

Eleventh-placed Louise-Anne Cole of the Miss Great Britain Party went through nearly £8,000 to win her 91 votes - equivalent to a mouth-watering £84.51 per vote. See where they get their money from at http://greenreading.blogspot.com/2008/07/glamour-politics.html

Here's a reminder of the election result along with what each candidate spent:

Candidate (Party) Votes spent spent per vote
John Howell (Con) - 19,796 (£98,016.82) 4.95
Stephen Kearney (Lib Dem) - 9,680 (£95,237.36) 9.84
Mark Stevenson (Green) - 1,321 (£1,055.75) 0.80
Timothy Rait (BNP) - 1,243 (£4,744.06) 3.82
Richard McKenzie (Lab) - 1,066 (£14,121.42) 13.25
Chris Adams (UKIP) - 843 (£17,056.00) 20.23
Bananaman Owen (Loony) - 242 (nil) 0
Derek Allpass (Eng Dem) - 157 (£2,095.00) 13.34
Amanda Harrington (Miss GB) - 128 (£9,327.36) 72.87
Dick Rodgers (Common Good) - 121 (£447.41) 3.7
Louise Cole (Miss GB) - 91 (£7,690.59) 84.51
Harry Bear (Fur Play) - 73 (Return not submitted) (bad bad bear!)

Sunday, 3 August 2008

Eco Homes and HIPs



What a surprise, yet another green initiative from the UK Government turns out to be false.
A group of MPs from all parties, working together to tackle climate change(really!), has said that current government policy is contradictory, and that many decisions need to be devolved to local authorities. The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee said in its recently released report, 'Climate Change and Local, Regional and Devolved Government' that there was inconsistency in the implementation and development of climate change policy across central, regional and local government - including the effective development of low carbon heating strategies.

The document urges the Government to force local authorities to include climate change indicators in their Local Area Agreement - which sets down an area's priorities. Taking action on cutting heating and energy costs is covered by the climate change indicators - which will be used to judge an authority's performance and also inform funding decisions.

No mention of the disasterous HIPs, which estate agents now claim are simply being ignored. The Law Society has accused estate agents of breaking the law by failing to prepare Home Information Packs for properties they are marketing. The packs were introduced a year ago and were made compulsory for all homes put on the market in England and Wales in December.

The aim is to provide potential buyers with greater transparency. But Law Society president Paul Marsh said in the current slow market, many agents and private sellers are delaying drawing up the Hip, which costs £300 for each property, until a sale has been agreed. The evidence is that these Hips are being ordered and not being processed. They are being suspended until such time as a buyer is found. "I don't think it is within the spirit of the regulations. Actually, I don't think it is within the regulations."

Also 46 MPs criticise the government's supposedly 'green' building policies as ignoring the real issues in favour of easy headlines. The first report into the environmental impact of offices, shops and factories says that instead of focusing on making new buildings 'zero carbon', the government's focus must shift to existing buildings, which make up 99 per cent of the current problem. Around half of all Britain's carbon emissions are associated with buildings, yet the government's focus has deliberately been on new properties, despite just one per cent of buildings being replaced each year. The group's inquiry, led by a cross party group of MPs and peers found that a major policy shift was needed to deal with the issue of existing buildings. Up to 70% of all non-domestic properties will still be with us in 2050, which means that existing buildings are one of the areas where the biggest carbon savings can be made.

The report also says that the government must lead by example. Many government buildings are among the worst performers when it comes to energy efficiency. Another group of MPs has criticised the government for relying on "green tariffs" in order to appear to be getting Departmental electricity from renewable sources. Although the government claims to have sourced 28.3% of its power needs from renewable sources, Parliament's Environmental Audit Committee said it had bought in the renewable power, rather than investing in on-site generation systems.
While six government Departments apparently used 95% renewable electricity thanks to green tariff power, the government only generated 0.0004% of its own electricity from on-site renewables like solar, wind or biomass power systems in 2005-06. The committee chaired by former environment minister Tim Yeo cast doubt on the "green" electricity the government had bought in, pointing out that even Defra was unhappy with the government claiming carbon emissions reductions from the green tariffs. Reporting on its inquiry into government efforts to cut its own carbon footprint, the committee said it believed green tariffs were a mere "branding" of renewable electricity that power companies have to buy under the Renewables Obligation each year anyway, regardless of whether customers are signed up to the green tariffs.

It is believed that around a third of energy savings can be made with little or no cost to anyone. In the UK, we also waste as much heat as we use. The group's report found that an overly bureaucratic approach to policy by the government was hindering progress. There are currently over 160 government departments and bodies involved in setting and delivering the green agenda.

The All Party urban Development Group's main recommendations are:
* One single measurement tool so businesses can compare one building with another and determine how green it is
* Better co-ordination of different government agencies working on environmental policy
* Clear advice and information for tenants and landlords on how to reduce energy use and make easy savings.
* Tighter building regulations that demand greater improvements from developers
* In-depth research on what fiscal and other incentives would make businesses change their behaviour

Commercial property is responsible for 17% of the UK's CO2 emissions. This is the equivalent of 250,000 long-haul flights between London and New York each year, or the averagely yearly car use of 90 million people.

The authorities have been talking the language, but on details are consistently falling short. These are wasted oppertunities, helping to give the impression that green equates to taxing and not reducing carbon emissions.

hattip AECB

Saturday, 2 August 2008

Camp for Climate Action in Kent



"Food riots abroad, house prices and pensions collapsing at home, energy prices skyrocketing worldwide. And slap bang in the middle of all of this - climate change - which the government and the power giant E.ON propose to make worse by building the UK's first coal-fired power station in 30 years at Kingsnorth in Kent."

The Climate Change Camp people have secured a site for the camp which will start officially on August 3rd, but people are welcome from now on.

Visit: http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/home

Below is Caroline Lucas's description of the impact the new coal powered station will have on our CO2 emissions.
"The proposed new coal fired power station in Kent - in my South East constituency - will be the first in Britain for 30 years, emitting up to 8 million tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere each year and would potentially keep doing so for 50 years. That annual emissions figure is as much C02 as the world's 24 lowest emitting countries combined.
And it won't stop here - Kingsnorth is likely to be merely the first in a number of new coal-fired power stations around the UK." Caroline Lucas
100 people entered and secured an uncultivated field at Deansgate Ridge at 3.00pm today, only 1 km from Kingsnorth Power Station. They erected and climbed tripods to prevent police from moving them and have erected a marquee alongside a banner which reads "No New Coal".
cl
.

"We want to warmly invite people from the local community to come down and see for themselves what the camp is all about" said Terry Graves, who has already pitched his tent up in the field.

"E.ON and the government believe that you can have endless fossil-fuelled economic growth in a world of finite resources" said Christina Greensford, who helped to secure the camp. "People from all over the UK are here to create a democratic, low-carbon society in which our long term future on this planet is prioritised over the short term profit margins of the fossil fuel industry."

"We have a future to protect, and today, in setting up the climate camp, we've drawn a line in the sand at Kingsnorth" said Hannah Abbots. "We will not allow companies like E.ON drag us over the edge of climate catastrophe."

PRESS CONTACTS:

Press can contact Conor O'Brian at 07530 306267
who is on site and arrange interviews, either over the phone or on the perimeter of the site.

Linux Versus Windows



After years of being frustrated by windows, and gradually weaning myself away from their products, today O took the big step and ditched them altogether. I'm using Ubuntu, a version of linux. So far its been quite straightforward.

http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-to-ubuntu-transition-guide/ has some advice on the transition. It appears to be quite easy to get programs to run, including a firewall. Lets see how it goes. So far it appears that software is easily available and free. And things seem to be compatible with each other, windows is always finding fault with something.

Windows seem to build up more problems as time goes by, eventually people get frustrated and buy a new pc or laptop. This is expensive and wasteful.

Brazil launches rainforest fund



Brazilian President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva has just launched an international fund to protect the Amazon rainforest and help combat climate change. The fund will promote alternatives to forest-clearing for people living in the Amazon, and support conservation and sustainable development. Officials will seek donations abroad and aim to raise $21bn (£11bn) by 2021. This target is too far in the future, as its fast disapearing, but at least its a start.

Greenpeace said it was the first time Brazil had accepted a link between global warming and preserving the rainforest. Carlos Minc (pictured left with the President) has taken over as environment minister recently from Marina Silva, who resigned in frustration at the government's environment policies in May. Mr Minc is a founder of Brazil's Green Party, and has the right credentials.

Roberto Mangabeira Unger, minister for strategic affairs, said "The fund is a vehicle by which foreign governments can help support our initiatives without exerting any influence over our national policy.

Tuesday, 29 July 2008

Green Leadership

The election for leadership of the Green Party is coming soon, and candidates have started to declare themselves. First to declare was Caroline Lucas MEP for leader and Cllr Adrian Ramsay for deputy, see their websites at www.carolinelucas.org.uk and www.adrianramsay.org.uk. Nominations will close on Thursday 31st July, and will be followed by a postal ballot of all members of the Green Party of England and Wales.

Also standing as leader is Asley Gunstock http://ashleygunstock.blogspot.com/
http://www.greenparty.org.uk/individual/187
and see his statement at http://weggis66.blogspot.com

Now I was not a big fan of our having a leader, but the Green Party voted for this and I am glad we have a selection of good candidates to choose from. Lets hope when we elect a leader we will get more media coverage, and be taken more seriously. Perhaps we also need a shadow green cabinet. But lets not go too far and become as corrupt and shallow as the bigger parties, who will say anything to appeal to the masses, no matter how contradictory.


http://www.greenparty.org.uk/leadership-elections
http://jimjay.blogspot.com/2008/07/launching-lucas-aid.html
http://jimjay.blogspot.com/2008/07/adrian-ramseys-leadership-bid.html
http://petercranie.blogspot.com/2008/07/adrian-ramsay.html
http://www.scriboergosum.org.uk/editor/998

Why I Oppose the Kennet Valley Plan



This is my submission to the people making a descision on the Kennet Valley Park. Please send your thoughts to; RSS Team, Government of the South East. 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4GA email rss@gose.gsi.gov.uk

No matter how often the developers keep returning to it this scheme was always a disaster. The planned development on the Kennet Valley would cause flooding downstream, including Reading. We shouldn't be building anything in the flood plane that will add to what is already a serious flooding problem in this country. We need to be allowing the water to recharge the groundwater naturally, not divert it into a sewer system not designed to cope with it.

The Environment Agency is to be congratulated for consistently opposing this(1). We live under the threat of a South East Plan that will add thousands of new houses to the region each year, it recently went up from 29,000 to more than 33,000.
Reading would be better off if we used the resources we had more effectively, not straining the town to the limit. There are empty office blocks and homes around the town, lets get these used before we build anything new. Is this about a sustainable future or building a monument to some rather large egos.

Regards Adrian Windisch

1. www.environment-agency.gov.uk/regions/thames/1290330/1290442/1299118/1300801/1301045/?lang=_e

--
adrian@windisch.co.uk,
18 Kent Road Reading RG30 2EJ,
tel 0118 9567190 mob 07802 671606

ONE WORLD. ONE CHANCE. GO GREEN.